Logo
The Hong Kong Association of Blood Transfusion and Haematology
Translocation t(16;21)(p11;q22) and acute myeloid leukaemia
Dr. Thomas S. K. Wan, Dr. Edmond S. K. Ma
Division of Haematology, Department of Pathology, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital
 

Case studies and literature review (Table 1)

Case 1:

A 14-year old boy presented with headache, nausea, vomiting and nose bleeding. Physical examination was unremarkable. Complete blood counts showed: Hb 9.4 g/dL, WBC 32 X 109/L (89% blasts, leucoerythroblastic picture, dysplastic neutrophils), and platelets 35 X 109/L. The marrow was markedly hypercellular showing replacement of normal haemopoietic elements by sheets of blasts (73%) with rather heterogeneous morphology. They were medium to large in size showing variable N:C ratio, round to irregular nucleus, basophilic cytoplasm and prominent round to irregularly shaped vacuoles. Auer rod was not seen. Very occasional blasts showed phagocytosis of other haemopoietic elements. Both erythroid and myeloid activities were reduced and morphologically dysplastic. Micromegakaryocytes were frequently encountered.

Blast cells showed marginal SBB (3%) and negative MPO staining on cytochemistry. Flow cytometric analysis of blast population showed expression of myeloid markers CD33, CD117, CD13 (weak) and anti-MPO (weak). Stem cell antigen CD34 was positive. A diagnosis of acute myeloblastic leukaemia, minimally differentiated, was made. Karyotype showed: 46,XY,t(16;21)(p11;q22)[10] (Figure 1).

The patient was treated with HKPHOSG 1996 protocol and attained complete remission.

Case 2:

A 23-year old man presented with fever and anaemic symptoms. Complete blood counts showed: Hb 7.9 g/dL, WBC 96.8 X 109/L (95% blasts) and platelets 19 X 109/L. The marrow was hypercellular showing 80% blasts and marked depression of normal haemopoietic elements. Myeloid cells of promyelocyte stage and beyond were scarce (5%). The blast cells were medium in size showing fine chromatin, weakly basophilic cytoplasm and scattered azurophilic granules in occasional ones. Auer rod was not seen. The blast population was positive for MPO (12%) and SBB (56%). A diagnosis of acute myeloblastic leukaemia without maturation was made. Karyotype showed: 46,XY,t(16;21)(p11;q22)[10] (Figure 2).

The patient attained complete remission after 7:3 induction and high dose ara-C consolidation. He received an allograft from a HLA-matched sibling and was complicated by severe GVHD that necessitated significant immunosuppression. The clinical course was further complicated by occurrence of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder for which he succumbed five months after transplantation.

Case 3:

An 18-year old boy presented with skin infections (boils) and petechiae. Complete blood counts showed: Hb 8.2 g/dL, WBC 44.2 X 109/L (68% blasts, 10% basophils), and platelet 66 X 109/L. The marrow was hypercellular showing an obvious increase in blasts (66%). They were medium to large in size with relatively low N:C ratio, multiple prominent nucleoli and finely granular cytoplasm. Some blasts showed monocytoid features whereas a few others bear strongly basophilic granules. Auer rod was not seen. Granulocytic maturation was evident but dysplastic. There was marrow basophilia (14%). Blast cells were positive for MPO (25%) and SBB (95%) on cytochemistry. A diagnosis of acute myeloblastic leukaemia with maturation was made. Karyotype showed: 46,XY,t(16;21)(p11;q22)[2]/ 46,idem,del(6)(q14q22)[8] (Figure 3).

Discussion

Translocation (16;21)(p11;q22) is a uncommon but recurrent cytogenetic abnormality described in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and one case of chronic myeloid leukaemia in blastic crisis. To date, around 30 cases of AML with t(16;21) are reported in the literature. There is a preponderance of young adults (median age at diagnosis = 30) and childhood cases are described. Both sexes are affected equally. Blasts show myeloid or monocytic morphology. Erythrophagocytosis by blast population may be encountered. Bone marrow may show increased eosinophils including abnormal forms. Interestingly most of the reported cases were from Japan and a predilection for Orientals cannot be excluded. While many aspects of this disease remain uncertain, the prognosis seems to be poor. In one study (Kong et al 1997), 18 of the 19 patients died of disease with a median overall survival of 16 months.

This translocation is rarely found as a sole abnormality and most often associated with other numerical or structural abnormalities. The translocation breakpoint in t(16;21)(p11;q22) has been cloned (Ichikawa et al 1994) and involves ERG on chromosome 21 and TLS/FUS on chromosome 16. The translocation results in TLS/FUS-ERG gene fusion and produces a chimeric transcript on der(21). The ERG gene located at 21q22 is a member of the ets oncogene family. The TLS/FUS gene at chromosome 16p11, first identified in myxoid liposarcoma, encodes an RNA-binding protein with extensive amino acid sequence homology to the EWS gene product involved in Ewing's and related tumours. Four isoforms of TLS/FUS-ERG fusion transcript may be identified.

Finally, t(16;21)(p11;q22) must be distinguished from another translocation associated with myeloid disorders, t(16;21)(q24;q22) that involves AML1-MTG16 gene fusion.

References


Table 1: Literature review of t(16;21)(p11;q22) in acute myeloid leukaemia
Reference Diagnosis Karyotype
Case 1 AML-M0 46,XY,t(16;21)(p11;q22)[10]
Berkowicz et al., 1990 AML-M1 46,XX,t(16;21)(p11;q22)/47,idem,+10
Sharam et al., 1999 AML-M1 46,XY,der(16)del(16)(q13)t(16;21)(p11;q22),der(21)t(16;21)
Case 2 AML-M1 46,XY,t(16;21)(p11;q22)[10]
Mecucci et al., 1985 AML-M2 46,XY,t(16;21)(p12;q22)
Minamhisamatsu & Ishihara, 1988 AML-M2 46,XX,t(16;21)(p11;q22)/ 46,idem,t(13;18)(q14;p11)/46,idem,t(1;11)(q32;q23)
Sadamori et al., 1990 AML-M2 46,XY,t(16;21)(p11;q22)/ 46,idem,ins(7;2???)(q11;p14;p23)
Tamura et al., 1993 AML-M2 46,XY,t(16;21)(p11;q22),-20,add(22)(p11)/50,idem,+4,+6,del(6)(q13)x2,+10,add(11)(q23),+22
Maseki et al., 1993 AML-M2 47,XX,+X,t(16;21)(p11;q22)/48,idem,+8
Hiyoshi et al., 1995 AML-M2 46,XX,t(16;21)(p11;q22)
Case 3 AML-M2 46,XY,t(16;21)(p11;q22)[2]/ 46,idem,del(6)(q14q22)[8]
Maseki et al., 1993 AML-M7 46,XX,t(16;21)(p11;q22)
Morgan et al., 1991 AML-M7 46,XX,t(16;21)(p11;q22)
Ferro et al., 1992 CML-BT 46,XX,t(9;22)(q34;q11),t(16;21)(p11;q22)/
49,idem,+8,+16,+der(22)t(9;22)(q34;q11)/
50,idem,+8,+16,+20,+der(22)t(9;22)(q34;q11)
Kong X-T et al., 1997 Reported 19 cases of t(16;21) in various FAB subtypes of AML including M1, M2, M4, M5a, M5b and M7

Back to Previous Page